Friday, December 10, 2010

Timber harvest opens second chapter in forest research saga

to better understand how human activities affect forest ecology.
ELLINGTON–Early next year, contractors working with the Missouri Department of Conservation will begin writing the second chapter in a century-long saga. Their theme is the quest to understand forest ecology. Their pages are rugged Ozarks hills, and their writing tools are chainsaws and skidders.
At its meeting Dec. 17 in Jefferson City, the Missouri Conservation Commission will consider seeking bids from professional loggers to harvest trees on 2,344 acres in Current River Conservation Area (CA) in Reynolds and Shannon counties and at Peck Ranch CA in Carter County. Altogether, the timber sales are expected to produce a little more than 7 million board feet of forest products, mostly oak.
The timber harvests are part of a carefully designed scientific experiment with breathtaking size and duration. The experiment, known as the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project, or MOFEP, was launched in 1990. It is designed to measure the effects of different management practices on various elements of the forest ecosystem. The study area covers 9,381 acres of forest and will span 100 years. Researchers who participate in its early phases will not live to see its conclusion.
MOFEP seeks answers to several questions, including:
·        How much carbon do Ozark forests sequester and how will climate change or different management scenarios affect carbon stocks?
·        How do different forest management practices influence abundance and reproductive success of birds?
·        How do different forest management practices affect tree growth, species composition and regeneration?
Preparations for MOFEP involved measuring a host of ecological factors on all 9,000-plus acres of MOFEP. Field workers documented existing populations of trees, wildflowers, fungi, insects, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals on MOFEP land. They studied soil and other physical components of the forest. Once these baseline data were assembled, MOFEP moved into its active phase – timber harvests – in 1996.
MOFEP methodically subjects small tracts of forest to different types of timber harvests and then measures the resulting changes. Timber harvests occur every 15 years.
On one-third of the MOFEP land, the Conservation Department conducts even-aged forest management. This involves cutting all trees within small tracts. The forest that re-grows on these tracts consists of trees of the same age – hence the name.
On another one-third of MOFEP land, contract loggers harvest individual trees and groups of trees selectively in what is known as uneven-aged management. This produces timber stands containing trees of different ages.
The remaining one-third of the study area is a scientific control, where no trees are harvested. The lack of timber harvests does not mean this forest is frozen in time, however. Trees die of natural causes, such as old age, disease and tornadoes, and they fall and decay. Field crews record these changes, too.
The 1996 timber harvests and subsequent measurements were Chapter 1 of MOFEP. Now, 15 years later, Chapter 2 is about to begin, as contract loggers return to harvest timber on different portions of MOFEP land.
On land under even-age management, they will thin 415 acres of forest and clear-cut another 488 acres. A total of 1,467 acres will be thinned under uneven-aged management, and 124 acres will have woodland/glade restoration work done.
Another 4,001 acres within the actively managed portions of MOFEP do not need treatment, according to standards MDC followed on all conservation areas. These acres will be reevaluated for possible timber harvests during the next MOFEP management cycle in 2026.
As always, the one-third of MOFEP land set aside as a control will receive no timber harvest, but monitoring of forest changes will continue there, as on the actively managed land.
As the forest changes under the three different management regimes, scientists collect and analyze data for insights about how different management strategies affect the forest ecosystem. Such insights already are accumulating and are being used by the Conservation Department to manage Missouri’s forests better.
One such insight is the observation that the first small-scale even-age timber harvests did not seem to hurt local populations of many forest bird species.
“For years, the Conservation Department has been concerned that logging in the Ozarks might contribute to the decline of migratory songbirds,” said MOFEP Coordinator David Gwaze. “This was based on the belief that logging could decrease available habitat or make songbirds more vulnerable to brown-headed cowbirds, which lay their eggs in other birds’ nests. But, study results so far show no increase in nest parasitism on MOFEP timber-harvest sites.”
According to Gwaze, early study results also indicate that logging – when performed according to MDC’s high standards – does not decrease the variety of bird species present in a forest tract. He said some birds that prefer mature forests, such as the ovenbird, may be less numerous around timber harvest sites. However, numbers of other forest-dwelling birds, including the wood thrush and Kentucky warbler, actually increase around harvest sites. So do numbers of birds, such as indigo buntings, yellow-breasted chats and prairie warblers, that prefer more open areas.
Similarly, the number and diversity of reptiles, amphibians and small mammals did not decline in areas with timber harvests.
Fieldwork during MOFEP’s first cycle shows the mix of tree species changing rapidly in control areas where no logging occurs. Gwaze said scarlet and black oaks are dying faster and not replacing themselves as rapidly as white oaks. The proportion of scarlet and black oaks also is declining in areas under uneven-age management. Where managers want to maintain the original mix of scarlet, black and white oaks, even-age management appears to be the best strategy.
The diversity of plant species growing on the forest floor is greater in areas where timber harvests have occurred than in unlogged areas, probably due to greater availability of light. For the same reason, berries and other wildlife food collectively called “soft mast” are more abundant in harvested areas.
Researchers also are discovering that even-age management is more efficient than uneven-age management in regenerating oak trees. Stump sprouting is the most common and efficient way to regenerate oak forests. So far, trees produce more, faster-growing sprouts after even-age harvests. As information continues to accumulate, managers will be able to use MOFEP data to refine regeneration practices and other management techniques.
Other MOFEP data suggest that root injuries caused by logging might contribute to harmful fungal infections, decreasing tree vigor and inhibiting stump sprouting. This indicates a need to find the exact causes of the injuries and educate loggers about how to avoid them.
So far, MOFEP results do not show that either even-aged or uneven-aged management is more profitable. The effects of each approach on other values, such as recreation, could be a significant factor in deciding which system to use.
“We are still very early in the study,” said Gwaze. “Some of these initial results might not hold true over the long term. We will adapt management as our knowledge and understanding of forests increases. MOFEP will have far-reaching effects on how we manage forests, but no one living now can say exactly what those effects will be. Today’s research is for future generations.”
MOFEP had to be designed as a long-term research project because the oak and hickory trees that make up the bulk of Missouri’s forests take 80 to 100 years to mature. The immediate goal is to track forest changes through one tree life cycle.
“Forests operate on a different time scale than people,” said Gwaze. “To understand them, you have to work on their time scale. Individuals don’t live long enough to do that, so several generations of workers will contribute to MOFEP. The longer we stay with it, the better we will understand how to manage the Ozarks forests for wildlife and plants sustainably.”
To learn more about the Missouri Ozarks Forest Ecosystem Project visit its official website at mofep.mdc.mo.gov/.
-Jim Low-
Enhanced by Zemanta

MEETING OF THE MISSOURI CONSERVATION COMMISSION

Conservation Department Headquarters
2901 West Truman Boulevard, Jefferson City, Missouri

Thursday, December 16, 2010 – 2:00 p.m. – Executive Session (Closed)
Friday, December 17, 2010 – 8:30 a.m. – Regular Open Meeting

TENTATIVE AGENDA

(Background documents related to each agenda item are available for public viewing at Conservation Department Headquarters, Jefferson City, for eight calendar days prior to the meeting. Any person who would like to comment to the Commission about a specific agenda item must make a written request to the Director at least four calendar days prior to the meeting. Speakers will be limited to five minutes each and number of speakers may be limited.  Recording the open meeting is permissible, pursuant to any guidelines established by the Commission to minimize disruption to the meeting. Individuals wishing to record the open meeting by audiotape, videotape or other electronic means should notify the Director at least four calendar days prior to the meeting so accommodations for such recording can be made.)

Thursday, December 16, 2:00 p.m.
Executive Session (Vote to go into closed session – reconvene open meeting at 8:30 a.m. on Friday, December 17):
(1)        Call to order and approval of minutes of previous Executive Session. (610.021 RSMo.)
(2)        Consideration of supporting documentation for recommendation to suspend or revoke all hunting and fishing privileges of individuals who are juveniles or who are not in compliance with applicable child support laws. Action to be taken in open meeting. (Disclosure protected by law, 610.021(14), 454.440.9, 211.321, RSMo.)
(3)        Consideration of confidential or privileged communications between the Commission and its Internal Auditor regarding work product. (Communications between public governmental body and its auditor, 610.021(17) RSMo.)
(4)        Consideration of recommendation relating to the hiring/firing/disciplining/promoting of personnel. (Hiring, firing, disciplining or promoting, 610.021(3) RSMo.)
(5)        Consideration of negotiated contracts. (Documents related to a negotiated contract, 610.021(12) RSMo.)
(6)        Update on potential real estate transactions/negotiations. (Leasing, purchase or sale of real estate, 610.021(2) RSMo.)
(7)        Consideration of legal actions and attorney-client privileged communications involving the Conservation Commission. (Legal actions, causes of action or litigation, 610.021(1) RSMo.)

Friday, December 17, 8:30 a.m. – Regular Open Meeting:
Approval of minutes of previous meeting.

Consideration of the Report of the Regulations Committee, which includes recommendations for the 1) 2011 turkey hunting seasons and spring turkey hunting brochure, and 2) opening date for the 2011 Fall Firearms Deer Season.

Presentations:
9:00 a.m.         Protection Division Report.

9:15 a.m.         Update on Implementation of Key Components of Vacancy Management Plan.

9:45 a.m.         Volunteer Service Awards presented to Karen Dunkle, Anita Hammann, and Pam Jones for over 2,000 hours of service each at Runge Conservation Nature Center, Jefferson City.

Recognition of volunteer Jim Hawes from Burr Oak Woods Conservation Nature Center, Blue Springs, as recipient of the National Association for Interpretation’s 2010 Outstanding Volunteer Interpreter Award.

10:15 a.m.       Clerical Employee of the Year Award.
                        Workforce Diversity Award.
                        Employee Service Awards.

11:15 a.m.       Dr. Harry and Mrs. Lina Berrier, Show-Me Barbecue, Columbia.

Consideration of 1) Major Construction/Development Projects Status Report; and 2) October and November Monthly Financial Summaries. 

Recommendation for approval of personnel reclassifications; recommendation to to appoint a new staff representative to the Board of Trustees for the Conservation Employees’ Benefits Plan Trust Fund; and 3) consideration of Quarterly Update of Conservation Employees’ Benefits Plan Trust Fund.

Recommendations for approval 1) to accept the bequest of approximately 76 acres in Texas County as an addition to the Gist Ranch Conservation Area; 2) to convey approximately 0.18 acre of Settles’ Ford Conservation Area in Bates County to Bates County for replacement of the Grand River Lane bridge over the South Grand River; and 3) of a perpetual conservation easement on approximately 295 acres in Lawrence County.

Recommendations for authorization to advertise and sell 1) an estimated 1.6 million board feet of timber located on 659 acres of Compartment 19, Peck Ranch Conservation Area (MoFEP 7), in Carter County; 2) an estimated 1.7 million board feet of timber located on 529 acres of Compartment 4, Peck Ranch Conservation Area (MoFEP 9), in Carter County; and 3) an estimated 3.9 million board feet of timber located on 1,164 acres of Compartments 2, 8, 9 and 17, Current River Conservation Area (MoFEP sites 2-5), in Reynolds County.

Recommendation for approval to designate two new Missouri Natural Areas and one Missouri Natural Area addition. 

Recommendation for approval of the 2009-2010 Annual Report for the Department of Conservation, and authorization for publication and distribution.

Recommendations for approval to 1) suspend or revoke one or more hunting, fishing and trapping privileges of individuals for cause; 2) suspend or revoke all hunting and fishing privileges of individuals who are not in compliance with applicable child support laws; 3) suspend or revoke one or more hunting, fishing and trapping privileges of individuals in accordance with the terms of the Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact; 4) suspend or revoke hunting privileges of one individual who inflicted injury to another person while hunting; and 5) reinstate hunting, fishing and trapping privileges for one individual previously suspended for cause.

Legislative Report.

Announcement of actions taken in executive session, if any.

Other matters of interest.

Confirmation that the next regular meeting will be held January 27-28, 2011, at Jefferson City.

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Firearms deer harvest continues to lag

With only the muzzleloader and late youth hunts remaining, this
year’s firearms deer harvest is likely to fall short of last year’s.
JEFFERSON CITY–Hunters checked 15,226 deer during the antlerless portion of Missouri’s firearms deer season Nov. 24 through Dec. 5, bringing the tally for the year to 217,281.
Top harvest counties for the 12-day antlerless hunt were Macon with 453 deer checked, Benton with 430 and Callaway with 401.
This year’s antlerless-deer harvest fell 31 percent short of last year’s figure. The decrease continues the trend set during the previous three portions of this year’s firearms deer season. In all, firearms deer hunters have checked 12,595 fewer deer this year than they had by this time last year, a decrease of 5.5 percent.
Two of the firearms deer season’s six portions remain. Hunters typically shoot 10,000 to 15,000 deer during the 11-day muzzleloader hunt and fewer than 2,000 during the two-day late portion of the youth hunt.
“Even with strong harvests in the muzzleloader and late youth portions, this year’s firearms deer harvest is likely to be smaller than last year’s,” said Resource Scientist Jason Sumners, a deer expert with the Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC).
Sumners attributes the decrease in firearms deer harvest so far this year partly to the abundance of acorns in some parts of Missouri. When acorns are abundant, deer do not have to move around as much to find food, and they are less likely to be concentrated around food sources. This makes them less vulnerable to hunters.
The muzzleloader portion of firearms deer season runs from Dec. 18 through 28. The late youth portion is Jan. 1 and 2. Archery deer and turkey season runs through Jan. 15.
For up-to-date deer and turkey harvest totals, see http://bit.ly/gkk1fG.
-Jim Low-

Enhanced by Zemanta

Elk Foundation to help fund Missouri elk restoration

Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation is making good on its pledge of financial support.

JEFFERSON CITY Mo – A national elk-conservation group whose support for elk restoration in Missouri dates back more than a decade is making good on its promise to financially support the current restoration effort.

Tom Jones, Senior Regional Director for the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation (RMEF), says the group already has raised enough money to begin paying for construction of an elk holding pen in Kentucky. The pen will hold elk during a precautionary quarantine period before they are relocated to Missouri.

“We are very grateful to the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation for its long-standing support of elk restoration in Missouri,” said Department of Conservation Director Bob Ziehmer. “Now that we are ready to move forward, the RMEF has wasted no time putting resources behind the effort.”

Ziehmer said partnerships between government and citizen conservation groups make it possible to achieve things far beyond their separate means.

“It is a model that has proven successful time and again and is responsible for America’s greatest conservation success stories,” said Ziehmer.

The RMEF, headquartered in Missoula, Mont., invested $61,123.50 to provide financial support for elk restoration in 2000, when the Missouri Conservation Commission first considered the idea. The Commission shelved the original plan in 2001 over concerns about adequate elk habitat and chronic wasting disease. In October of this year, the Commission approved a revised elk-restoration plan that addresses these concerns. The RMEF immediately began fundraising efforts to help implement the plan, and those efforts continue.

“Our volunteers and membership have worked tirelessly over the last 26 years to raise money to ensure the future of elk, other wildlife and their habitat,” said Jones. “What a tremendous conservation accomplishment this will be to restore elk back to the Show-Me State after a 150-year absence. The Elk Foundation is proud to be able to step forward and actually put money ‘on the ground’ for this project. No doubt, our strong volunteer core and membership base will continue to work hard to raise additional funds to leave this important wildlife legacy.

Missouri’s restoration plan calls for releasing up to 150 elk in a 346-square-mile area spanning parts of Shannon, Carter and Reynolds counties. The Conservation Department selected this limited restoration zone because of extensive public lands, suitable habitat, low road density, minimal agricultural activity and landowner support.

Construction of a holding pen in Kentucky will begin later this month. Trapping of elk is expected to begin in late December or early January. Trapped elk will remain in the Kentucky holding pen to meet the health testing protocol. Once in Missouri, they will be kept in a holding pen at Peck Ranch Conservation Area (CA) to allow them to acclimate to the area. Construction of the pen at Peck Ranch will take place in January. If all goes according to plan, the first elk could be released into the wild at Peck Ranch CA in late April or early May.

“It is very exciting to see these plans moving forward,” said Department of Conservation Resource Scientist Lonnie Hansen. “We are confident that we have adequately addressed all the concerns about elk restoration, and many Missourians are excited about the prospect of having this native animal back in Missouri after an absence of more than 100 years.”

The elk-restoration plan is available at http://bit.ly/i6Pxhy.

-Jim Low-


Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, December 3, 2010

Antlerless Season Coming to a Close in Missouri

The antlerless portion of the deer season draws to a close in a couple of days and for many Show-Me -State hunters, that will end their deer hunting endeavors for the year.  Of course if you are a muzzleloader hunter or a bow hunter, your season still has quite a bit of life left in it.

The muzzleloader season runs from the 18th of December to the 28th and the archery season runs until January 15th.  I have been saying it now for a couple of years, but this will be the year I pick up archery hunting. The bow season is something that has enticed me for several years now.  With my youngest headed off to college next year, there will be more free time anyway.  Besides, with two in college, there might be a real necessity for that venison!

It has been a rewarding deer season for us and we hope it has been for you as well.  As it winds down, we start thinking about Winter trout fishing and even start thinking ahead for the next deer season.  If you will be out this weekend, be careful and we hope you get a chance to harvest a deer to fill that freezer.

If you are ready to start thinking about some Winter trout fishing, check us out over at Family-Outdoors Winter Trout.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Enhanced habitat for threatened fish, improved driving conditions for Dallas County residents: Recovery Act bridge replacement project complete in Southwest Missouri

Map of the Osage River watershed.Image via WikipediaThe U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service celebrates today the completion of a new bridge within the Osage River Basin that will enhance habitat for the Federally threatened Niangua darter and improve driving conditions for Missouri drivers. The Service's Columbia Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office (FWCO) worked cooperatively with the Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) to replace the Benton Branch river crossing over the Niangua River in Dallas County using funding provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

Fly fishing for Trout in Missouri
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

The Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Releases a Literature Review on the Benefits of Outdoor Skills to Health, Learning and Lifestyle

Joint Base Lewis-McChord outdoor adventure: 'T...Image by familymwr via Flickr
WASHINGTON, DC — The Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies today released a white paper Benefits of Outdoor Skills to Health, Learning and Lifestyle: A Literature Review
documenting the contributions of outdoor skills and wildlife-related outdoor education to health, learning and lifestyle in general and fishing and hunting participation in particular.
Research into the benefits of outdoor skills education highlights the valuable contribution they make to personal health and wellbeing. When young people are able to connect with the outdoors regularly, the positive outcomes are profound. They are happier, healthier from the physical exercise, effects of attention-deficit disorder are reduced and they score higher on standardized tests when natural environments are integrated into school curricula.
Outdoor skills activities such as hunting and fishing provide opportunities for the connection of individuals with nature (the natural environment), direct connection with other people (interpersonal) and with themselves (personal). Specifically, the benefits of these connections lie in the strength and placement of these connections from the leisure context to everyday lives.
This comprehensive report draws on research from adult learning, education (i.e., adventure, boating, conservation, experiential, hunting, fishing, outdoor, physical and wilderness), health, leisure, recreation, sport, therapy, and at-risk-youth to highlight the evidence of the positive contributions of outdoor skills education on hunting, fishing and other outdoor activities. The white paper includes abstracts for 99 documents; highlights some best practice outdoor skills education programs delivered by state fish and wildlife agencies and other partners; and offers recommendations for consideration when developing new or updating existing outdoor skills programs.
Highlighted Research Findings – The Benefits of Taking It Outdoors:
  • A growing body of studies suggests that contact with nature is as important to children as good nutrition and adequate sleep: time spent outdoors correlates with increased physical activity and fitness in children; exposure to green space reduces crime, increases general wellbeing and ability to focus; children as young as five have shown a significant reduction in the symptoms of Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) when they are engaged in outdoor activities in natural settings. Research indicates that there could be reductions in crime as a result of outdoor education.
  • Interpersonal and intrapersonal skills developed through engaging in nature-based activities in meaningful ways represent some of the main benefits of outdoor skills education.
  • The benefits that result from participating in outdoor activities can be enhanced through appropriate facility provision and access to natural resources as well as the design of outdoor skills education programs that work towards specific objectives.
  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has found that children who are more active outdoors and hang out outdoors tend to engage in greater physical activity as youth and later as adults.
Overall, the literature implies the need to adopt a broader-based conception of health from a holistic ecological perspective that moves beyond human physical and mental health to one that includes familial, communal, national, international and global ecological health.  Active living is crucial to healthy lifestyles and leads to potentially greater participation in fishing and hunting.
The report was developed by the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies’ North American Conservation Education Strategy under contract with Cottrell & Associates: Environmental Consulting. Designed by experts from state fish and wildlife agencies, the North American Conservation Education (CE) Strategydelivers unified, research-based Core Concepts and messages about fish and wildlife conservation, translated into K-12 academic standards to shape students’ environmental literacy, stewardship and outdoor skills. The Core Concepts identify what every citizen should know, feel and do related to fish and wildlife conservation.
Funding for the report was provided by the Multistate Conservation Grant Program, which is supported through special excise taxes on hunting, shooting, archery and angling equipment, a tax on boating fuels and license fees paid by America’s hunters and anglers.
# # #
The Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies —the organization that represents North America's fish and wildlife agencies—promotes sound management and conservation, and speaks with a collective voice on important fish and wildlife issues. Found on the web at www.fishwildlife.org .

Enhanced by Zemanta

10 Tips to Keep Your Outdoor Gear in Working Order and Well Organized

Camping Gear - It's expensive to buy, make it last. Maintaining and organizing your outdoor gear is crucial for ensuring it remains func...